The New Frontier: Digital Mental Health Interventions for Workplace Wellness
- Rytlife
- Smrithi C & Neethu Prakashan
Highlights
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (DMHI) improve employee well-being and reduce stress.
- Personalised interventions effectively combat depression and anxiety.
- Anonymity in digital interventions both aids and challenges engagement.
- Implementing DMHIs needs customised strategies for diverse needs
Employee psychological well-being, crucial for both personal and professional development, is influenced by mental health in the workplace. It’s defined as the emotional and purposeful state experienced by individuals during work hours (Robertson & Flint-Taylor, 2009). The significance of employee mental health extends beyond individual well-being, affecting organisational productivity through increased absenteeism, decreased productivity, and heightened costs associated with managing mental health issues (World Health Organisation, 2005).
The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of mental health, leading to enhanced policies and practices aimed at improving workplace conditions. These initiatives include a broader availability of mental health resources, the promotion of self-care programs, and efforts to reduce barriers to accessing mental health treatments (Villarreal-Zegarra et al., 2022). Digital Mental Health Interventions (DMHIs) have emerged as a pivotal solution during the pandemic. These online and mobile platform-based interventions provide a range of psychological treatments and have been integrated into workplace wellness programs. They include telehealth services, which offer mental health care via phone or video conferencing, making treatment more accessible to employees (Lattie et al., 2022).
Studies have validated the effectiveness of DMHIs in enhancing employee psychological well-being and reducing stress, particularly highlighting their benefit in environments lacking direct healthcare professional involvement.
Despite their effectiveness, a gap in customization to individual needs has been noted (Stratton et al., 2017; Griffiths et al., 2006; Howarth et al., 2018). Blended interventions, combining digital resources with traditional clinical methods, have shown promise in addressing this gap by effectively mitigating symptoms of depression and anxiety, and facilitating the reintegration into work for those with high psychological distress (Volker et al., 2015; Blonk et al.,2006). The advantages of DMHIs, such as anonymity and 24/7 availability, address significant barriers to seeking mental health care, such as stigma and accessibility. Moreover, their scalability and cost-effectiveness make them a valuable asset for reaching a broader employee base. Tailoring these interventions to meet specific individual needs is crucial for their success, emphasising the development of personalised approaches in digital mental health care (Carolan & de Visser, 2018; Lustria et al., 2009).
However, challenges persist, particularly in integrating digital interventions within the workplace. Employees often struggle to find the time and privacy needed to engage with these resources effectively, and the shift from work to therapy mode can be jarring.
Anonymity, while reducing stigma, can also lead to lower engagement levels. Recognizing these challenges, digital interventions should be viewed as an initial step in a comprehensive therapeutic process, with disengagement considered part of the broader journey toward seeking help (Carolan & de Visser, 2018).
In conclusion, Digital Mental Health Interventions represent a significant stride forward in addressing the psychological well-being of employees. Their benefits include increased flexibility, reduced stigma through anonymity, and the potential for wide-reaching impact. For their effective deployment, organisations must ensure that these interventions are well-promoted among management and tailored to the diverse needs of the workforce, fostering an environment where mental health is a prioritised aspect of workplace wellness.
References
Blonk, R. W., Brenninkmeijer, V., Lagerveld, S. E., & Houtman, I. L. (2006). Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work & Stress, 20(2), 129-144.
Carolan, S., & de Visser, R. O. (2018). Employees’ perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to engaging with digital mental health interventions in the workplace: qualitative study. JMIR mental health, 5(1), e9146.
Griffiths, F., Lindenmeyer, A., Powell, J., Lowe, P., & Thorogood, M. (2006). Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. Journal of medical Internet research, 8(2), e498.
Howarth, A., Quesada, J., Silva, J., Judycki, S., & Mills, P. R. (2018). The impact of digital health interventions on health-related outcomes in the workplace: a systematic review. Digital health, 4, 2055207618770861.
Lattie, E. G., Stiles-Shields, C., & Graham, A. K. (2022). An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(2), 87-100.
Lustria, M. L. A., Cortese, J., Noar, S. M., & Glueckauf, R. L. (2009). Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. Patient education and counseling, 74(2), 156-173.
Pandya, A., Khanal, N., & Upadhyaya, M. (2022). Workplace Mental Health Interventions in India: A Rapid Systematic Scoping Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 10.
SSRN Electronic Journal
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.800880Robertson I. T., Flint-Taylor J. (2009). Oxford Handbook on Organizational Well-being. Oxford University Press.
Stratton, E., Lampit, A., Choi, I., Calvo, R. A., Harvey, S. B., & Glozier, N. (2017). Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for reducing mental health conditions in employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 12(12), e0189904.
Villarreal-Zegarra, D., Reátegui-Rivera, C. M., Sabastizagal-Vela, I., Burgos-Flores, M. A., Cama-Ttito, N. A., & Rosales-Rimache, J. (2022). Policies on mental health in the workplace during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0272296.
Volker, D., Zijlstra-Vlasveld, M. C., Anema, J. R., Beekman, A. T., Brouwers, E. P., Emons, W. H., ... & van der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M. (2015). Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 17(5), e116.
World Health Organisation. (2005). Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Package MENTAL HEALTH POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES IN THE WORKPLACE.
Search
Recent Comments
- No Comments
- What is artificial intelligence?
- Limited Adoption of AI in Mental Health
- AI's Ongoing Development
- Benefits and Challenges of AI in Mental Health
- Ethical Considerations in AI Integration
Keywords
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (DMHIs)
- personalization
- anonymity
- workplace well-being